My 70 Things List, item #6 "Go to the Cinema" has been ticked off. On Easter Sunday, Nick our Pastor showed a trailer for "The King Of Kings" which came out a couple of weeks ago.
This was an interesting film with an intriguing history. In 1849, Charles Dickens wrote a story for his children "The Life of Our Lord" which he then read to his family every Christmas. He bequeathed the manuscript to his sister in law in 1870, and said it was never to leave the family or be published whilst his children were alive. She died in 1917, and it passed to the youngest of Charles' sons, Henry. In his will, he stated that if the majority of the family agreed, it could be published. So in 1934, his widow and children sold it to an American company for £200K....Fast forward 90 years, and an animated film has been produced.

Why was it bizarre? Well it seems to be sponsored by some US Christian groups, but produced by a South Korean film studio. It has a rather star studded cast - Kenneth Branagh is Dickens, Uma Thurman is his wife, Ben Kingsley is Caiaphas the High Priest, Pierce Brosnan is Pontius Pilate. Mark Hamill is Herod, and Forest Whittaker plays Peter. Oscar Isaac is Jesus and Roman Griffin Davis Is Walter [Dickens' son]
In the film, Walter is obsessed with King Arthur, and Mrs D suggests to Charles that he tells his son the story of The King of Kings and Son of God. So he does, and the boy [plus the cat] gets caught up in the story, and is transported to 1st century Palestine. He warns Mary and Joseph to escape from Herod's soldiers, he sits and listens to the Sermon on the Mount, He watches the Palm Sunday Procession and the crucifixion - and witnesses the Resurrection.
They have tried to cram too much into 105 minutes - Jesus' birth, life, death and resurrection plus Adam and Eve, and the Passover story en route. And how did they decided which Gospel events to put in? They've included Slaughter of the innocents, when young Jesus got lost, The Temptations, Blind Bartimaeus, Resurrection of Lazarus, Sermon on the Mount, Miraculous Catch of Fishes, Walking on the Water, Feeding 5K, Man through the roof, the woman who anointed Jesus' feet, clearing the temple, Judas with his 30 pieces of silver...and even the woman taken in adultery. It is a year's worth of Sunday school lessons and then some.
They have tried to cram too much into 105 minutes - Jesus' birth, life, death and resurrection plus Adam and Eve, and the Passover story en route. And how did they decided which Gospel events to put in? They've included Slaughter of the innocents, when young Jesus got lost, The Temptations, Blind Bartimaeus, Resurrection of Lazarus, Sermon on the Mount, Miraculous Catch of Fishes, Walking on the Water, Feeding 5K, Man through the roof, the woman who anointed Jesus' feet, clearing the temple, Judas with his 30 pieces of silver...and even the woman taken in adultery. It is a year's worth of Sunday school lessons and then some.
One minute you see the Victorian child at home in London as his dad tells the story, then next minute they are transported to a dusty, crowded middle eastern street [still in their 1800s clothes] I think if you don't know the Bible narrative very well, you might get a bit lost. And I am not altogether sure about the characters
All the Pharisees and disciples had HUGE noses and were generally not very attractive. But the Jesus character was slim, with a tiny neck, and lovely hair - but he looked like those bobble head caricatures people stick on their dashboards. And the three Marys all looked the same to me [Mary his Mum, Mary sister of Lazarus, Mary at the tomb] Over the closing credits, inexplicably, they played the 1896 hymn "I surrender all"
It is rated PG in the UK and USA because of violence.
So who is this film aimed at?
So who is this film aimed at?
I am not sure I'd use it as an evangelistic tool. But as Bob said, there were some clips that would be good sermon illustrations, or useful to tell a story at Holiday Club [no, we are not doing anymore!] I don't think I'd take my grandchildren - too scary for the little ones, and too complex a story even for Rosie to make sense of.
It was a fun afternoon out - but I was glad we had not paid over thirty quid for the experience! I am sort of relieved that the Guardian reviewer had similar reactions
*** please let me know if you have seen it and what you thought
Just before we went to the cinema, I heard of the death of the Pope. I am pleased he was able to come onto the balcony in St Peter's Square on Sunday and wave to the crowds. RIP Francis. Having recently read Conclave, I suspect we may now shell out a fiver to watch the film at home sometime.
But a final thoughtful comment from Pierce Brosnan who was interviewed about the film, he simply said
I tell you, this will be good to have a retelling of Jesus Christ, Our Lord, Our Saviour. Why not? We need it....
But a final thoughtful comment from Pierce Brosnan who was interviewed about the film, he simply said
I tell you, this will be good to have a retelling of Jesus Christ, Our Lord, Our Saviour. Why not? We need it....
Ooh, I knew nothing about it! Intrigued xc
ReplyDeleteWe hadn't heard of it till Nick mentioned it on Sunday
ReplyDeleteI too knew nothing about this film sounds rather muddled and I don't think it is one I will go to see. I remember in the 1960s our whole school went to see The Greatest Story Ever Told as our headmistress had seen it and was very moved by it. Max von Sydow played Jesus. It made a lasting impression on my friends and I. Even today even though dated it is still very moving. Regards Sue H
ReplyDeleteI think I must find and read the book!
ReplyDeleteI'm glad you've been able to cross of one of the items on your list! Thank you for the link to the trailer.
ReplyDeleteI think the trailer in the US is slightly different
DeleteI think I would come out of the cinema feeling slightly befuddled after so much story being crammed into so short a time frame. Even knowing the stories must have made it feel very rushed and almost too inclusive of events. It has a star studded cast though doesn't it, it was obviously thought very highly of.
ReplyDeleteOne imagines that such actors can pick and choose what they do, so they must be supportive of the story
DeleteSounds an interesting film but glad you didn’t pay too much to see it. Try to watch Conclave if you can-it was definitely worth the £4.99 from Prime. Norrie’s 76th birthday today so we went to a localish garden centre for breakfast and then he chose some nice things from the farm shop for his lunch and dinner. Catriona
ReplyDeleteConclave will be watched soon. Happy Birthday Norrie!
DeleteSounds like another film where the original story (Gospels) got a bit jazzed up in the retelling! Conclave sounds interesting, I haven't read the book yet.
ReplyDeleteI just found the original Dickens book online (in it's entirety) It's rather archaic language, the film has certainly taken liberties with the text!!!
ReplyDeleteI asked my son if it was worth forking out a fiver to watch Conclave (even though I have subscribed to free trial Amazon for a month!) And he said yes so that's what I'm going to do this weekend. I think it will be streaming in UK for free in May?
ReplyDeleteI wanted to watch it before the actual Conckave starts on May 5th
ReplyDeleteI don't think I would want to watch "King of Kings", too much crammed into it. I'd rather read the book! I hadn't taken note that there is a movie called "The Conclave", which sounds interesting. I imagine it is hard for the elected Pope to realize that the rest of his life must be in Rome. Pope Francis never did return to Argentina for a visit, because of political divisions there. I did see "The Two Popes" and I really enjoyed it.
ReplyDeleteWe watched Conclave last night, I thought it was well cast, and very true to the book. I haven't seen Two Popes
ReplyDeleteI didn't know about this new film but it does sound like they were trying to fit too much into the time available. 'Conclave', both the film and book are on my list of things to read and watch.
ReplyDeleteI hope you enjoy Conclave
Delete