There is an explanatory website here. I looked at the empty bowl
The website says it is 24cm in diameter. I've estimated the volume to be around 950ml. A normal stomach-full is reckoned to be about 1litre. The review in the Guardian was not very complimentary - read it here
Personally, I don't see the point of spending the best part of twenty quid on a plastic dish with its own sphincter.
Our day-to-day crockery is IKEA Dinera. The cereal bowl holds 450ml, and the shallow large bowl holds twice that.
We frequently have our meals in these bowls, and I am happy with them and their capacity is usually appropriate for our needs. I do not need to be reminded of my innards quite so graphically. Furthermore, that large flat rim of the Full Stop Bowl is just crying out for a triangle or two of bread and butter, or fingers of toast, or a small banana, or pot of fromage frais... Which rather defeats the object of the exercise.
The bizarre shape would not accommodate certain foods very easily. A Cornish pasty, large pork chop, slice of pizza...
I am choosing the Full Stop Bowl as my January Pointless Gadget of the Month.
What would you choose?
It seems no one is capable any more of making their own sensible choices. Why on earth would anyone need a bowl like that when one only has to eat a bit less in a normal bowl. 'Spoonfed' , that's what we are all being led to! (mumble mumble....)
ReplyDeleteI guess some of us need the more graphic reminder. :) I've switched to a smaller plate.
ReplyDelete