Wednesday, 17 April 2024

A Lot Of Hoo-ha

 According to the Cambridge English Dictionary, hoo-ha  means "Too much interest or discussion about something that is not important. Synonyms; commotion, disturbance, kerfuffle" There's plenty of hooha in the sporting world right now.
Those who know me well will be aware that I am not in any sense a sport sort of person - I don't support any football teams, or watch sport on TV. I cheer Steph and Gaz from the sidelines when they are running. That's about it.
 My only competitive game is Scrabble. And don't get me started on the 'new' version announced last week. All I can say is words fail me!
This summer the Olympic Games will happen in Paris
The French team revealed their outfits recently, designed by Stephane Ashpool, the guy behind the popular Pigalle streetwear brand. I quite like it, well thought out, using the tricolor as its overall motif - and clever twists [check out the link above - I like the fencing kit - all white apart from the tricolor mask]
We've yet to see the Team GB uniform - but there was some hooha when they revealed the new flag. There has already been so much fuss about the pink and purple that they have had to agree that the team themselves will have the traditional red-white-and-blue flags.
But if you really want kerfuffle, take a look at the outfits designed by Nike for Team USA
For starters, these are all different colours, there's no cohesiveness about them. Then [you can't see this here] the script on them is apparently very close to the despised comic sans. But worst of all, the kit appears to many to be extremely sexist in design.

Nike have said "On the apparel side, why it's a game changer for us, is that because we've now been able to take athletic insights, along with data, and use that algorithm to create something that allows us to get to a level of specificity, fidelity and accuracy that we've never been able to do before"
For track and field events, men get to wear shorts, but female athletes have a sleeveless one piece which is high cut and extremely revealing round their ..lower regions [in the US often referred to as the hooha]
There has been an incredible amount of backlash. These garments have been declared totally unfit for purpose. Many sportswomen have said they would feel unable to run, do long jump, or high jump, or walk - basically, they feel any movement might trigger an embarrassing "wardrobe malfunction". Not to mention chafing and general discomfort. 
One suggested that they might like to get EuropeanWax to be the team sponsor. Others have questioned where they got their "Athletic insights" saying "men just need to worry about their athletic performance, women have to worry about chafing...and getting a bikini wax. Definitely equal opportunities, huh!"
Nike is worth $138 billion, they surely are aware of the impact of this design. These garments imply sexism and incompetence. Girls are twice as likely as boys to drop out of sports by the age of 14. Dealing with body mage and self-esteem issues is very hard, without being expected to wear such revealing, uncomfortable outfits. Nike have got this one very wrong!
Let's hope someone at Team GB is taking note, and when the British kit is announced later this month, it is a little more appropriate. This is meant to be world class sport, not a throwback to the days of Baywatch [toned down porn]
When the first modern day Olympians said "Faster, Higher, Stronger" the second word did not refer to the cut of the garments!!
 






24 comments:

  1. The challenge is for France Netherlands USA and GB all to come up with something unique using red white and blue! But it is long past time when they should be asking what female athletes would REALLY like to wear.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Gen Z don't like competitive games??? Are they really such snowflakes? My friend Tacye (extremely erudite academic) and I invented 'Collaborative Scrabble' which was just a version where we made words together for the joy of the words but that was just using the normal Scrabble board. How silly!
    That leotard is obscene!
    What are they thinking?
    I just read a lovely children 's book about the Olympics so I feel v clued up!
    I look forward to the uniforms!
    Kx

    ReplyDelete
  3. The leotards are appalling. Playboy comes to mind.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is an "international Code of Points" for gymnastic competitions, which has definite rules for attire. I cannot believe this leotard would be considered acceptable.

      Delete
  4. I had not heard about the Team USA outfits for the Olympics. Interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Susan From Across the Pond17 April 2024 at 11:42

    The U.S. uniforms are a disgrace. They are a complete distraction from the athletic excellence to which the women have dedicated themselves. Shame on Nike.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Unacceptable sportswear for so many reasons, especially for the men who compete as women.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I too found the news about a less competitive version of Scrabble astonishing. As for those high cut outfits for the American sport women.....ridiculous.
    Alison in Wales x

    ReplyDelete
  8. Oh Ang, you're an absolute hoot! "Often referred to as the hooha" has got to be your funniest line yet! Apart from all that, I truly believe it really is a mad,mad world!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Some of my readers are of a delicate disposition!

      Delete
  9. If female athletes are expected to wear what is basically a wide thong, the men should all have to wear 'Mankinis'!
    They'd look ridiculous, and to be honest, revolting, but fair's fair, if the women have to suffer, so should the men.
    Of course, it would be far simpler, and a lot easier on the eye, to just allow all genders to wear shorts!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And possibly more comfortable for the athletes?

      Delete
  10. I'm a bit late to the discussion but I agree comfortable shorts for all with plenty of stretch to allow ease of movement, the clothes should be completely functional with no titillation whatsoever. My goodness Nike should be shot. And as to the new Scrabble don't get me started.😠 Regards Sue H

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I suspected you wouldn't be thrilled with the new Scrabble , Sue!

      Delete
  11. I don't even like the beach volleyball "uniforms" for women, and these high cut outfits are ridiculous for a situation where comfort and practicality should come first. Then, at the risk of upsetting a lot of people, I believe that the Olympic Games are not appropriate in a world that is already experiencing climate change, as well as famine and extreme poverty, especially for children. How many countries in the past have spent ridiculous sums in creating the necessary facilities for the games, turned the poor out of their housing, run up fantastic debts and suffered the economic consequences, all for the sake of phony prestige?

    ReplyDelete
  12. A very thought provoking comment. Thank you Bushlady

    ReplyDelete
  13. At first glance, one has to ask whether Nike involved anyone who would be wearing these outfits for their intended purpose, as opposed to lovvies wanting to make a provocative photoshoot?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I quite agree! And as I understand it, they used models, not athletes to wear them for the launch photos

      Delete

Always glad to hear from you - thanks for stopping by!
I am blocking anonymous comments now, due to excessive spam!