Monday, 27 January 2025

Cold And Wet

I need to get back into a better reading pattern. So I have challenged myself to review two books a month on the blog. I read three in January [first review here] and the third needs a proper review carefully written. 

I think it is fair to say my second book was the wrong choice for me! The mobile library was on its monthly visit, and I'd chosen two non fiction books, and was just about to check out when I spotted this one. 
I like crime, I am quite keen on medical dramas, it was set at the winter solstice, and when I saw the author's name and read the blurb [here] I thought it would suit.

  • It is set on a remote Scottish Island [and I love 'Shetland']
  • The male lead, Calder, falls into the icy seas and 'drowns' but in fact they revive him from his extreme hypothermia [As with Meredith Grey, Greys's Anatomy, Season 3 Ep 16 when she falls into the water off Seattle. I love GA]
  • In my haste I mistook Liz Webb for Liz Carr, who for 8 years played the skilled forensic pathologist in Silent Witness [I love SW]
O dear... I was so wrong. 
I just did not get on with the writing - the story is told in the first person by Nancy, Calder's girlfriend. spoiler alert - important plot detail revealed below
The people on the island are all interconnected. C&N have moved back there because C's Mum has died and left him her cottage. So everybody knows Calder's past. And how his ex girlfriend went missing just before C left the island for London [a girl he had never mentioned to Nancy before] Arran, the Pastor of the little church, is also a key figure in the story. After C's near death experience, best friend Hamish and wife arrive from London to help out. Hamish also grew up on the island.
My problem is that I like accuracy. I believe that Liz [Webb not Carr] did loads of research into this "hypothermia/survival through drowning" event, she cites various well documented cases [real ones, not Meredith Grey] and that she also researched life on Scottish Islands. That part was good.
But she clearly did no research into 'how to get married in Britain'. Or she would know that you cannot get married at three weeks notice - you need at least 29 days [ok, there are a few rare exceptions when a waiver might be possible but not in this story] and furthermore, both parties must make the application. You cannot say "we'll get married tomorrow, I arranged it with the vicar three weeks ago, but never got round to telling you" At this point the story seemed just stupid to me.
Mind you I was already concerned about Arran who conducts everything at church in a very traditional 1950s way, yet quotes from The Message translation of the Bible. LW doesn't appear to know many pastors. 
There was a lot of cold weather, and icy water, and I am afraid  I did not warm to any of the characters. 
Maybe if I watched 'The Traitors' I'd have coped better with the fact that everybody [including the Pastor] is lying to everybody else. Am I the only person [other than Bob] who has not watched Traitors? Even Rosie watched the finale last week with her Mum [having first donned the hooded cloak I made for her worst witch costume - she takes accuracy seriously too]
I give it just ***

26 comments:

  1. I'll skip that book then! I've just finished Moonflower Murders (Anthony Horowitz) which I did enjoy, and started 'And Furthermore' Judi Dench. No, we didn't watch 'the Traitors' either.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I hope you enjoy the books you have chosen AND don't stress yourself out, enjoy them, word for word.
    I look forward to your reviews. I'm playing with cotton fabrics. It's raining here today too... but I'll still go for a walk with my lovely rain jacket.
    Happy greetings from Viola
    I hope you have a good week, dear Angela.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Enjoy your cotton fabrics! Lots of rain here too

      Delete
  3. We are not watching Traitors either. The concept seems so odd to me.
    Take care, good luck with your next book choice.
    Jill

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I must reserve Precipice from library (see below)

      Delete
  4. That sounds like a frustrating read. Wrong details can really take you out of a book.

    I hope that you're staying warm and safe in all this weather.

    ReplyDelete
  5. My husband and I haven't watched Traitors, not interested. I like some crime books but have gone off them a bit lately. I have read lots of autobiographical books recently, the best being Joan Bakewell. I can't settle to much fiction although I really enjoyed Robert Harris's Precipice. I hope you enjoy your next book choice more. Regards Sue H

    ReplyDelete
  6. I also have not watched Traitors-it sounds a bit rubbishy and unpleasant. There has been so much fuss about it!

    ReplyDelete
  7. It sounds like it could have been such a good story if told well and accurately, what a shame, more research was obviously needed. My son gets cross when crime shows show sloppy forensics and Alan fumes at bad submarine and nuclear information. I too loved Liz Carr in her role in SW, but I'm not enjoying this new series as much as all the others for some reason.

    Nope, I have never watched The Traitors either.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I haven't quite clicked with the new series yet. I think it's the piano playing...

      Delete
  8. Never watched Traitors either. Thanks for the book review-I won’t be reading it. I read my first Ian Rankin book for our readers’ group and it will be my only one-I just could not get what all the hype is about regarding Rebus stories. My current book of choice I’d The Figurine by Victoria Hyslop but I’m not feeling any good vibes from that either -perhaps my virus has left me more jaded than I thought! Catriona

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I love Rebus (and Scottish locations) yet to read VH, despite people telling me too. I think Ian H is a clever chap

      Delete
  9. I find inaccuracy very annoying, especially when it is something that could have been properly researched. I dont watch The Traitors either.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thank you for the book review. I don't like crime novels, mysteries, etc., so, probably not a book I'd want to read, anyway. Haven't watched The Traitors (had to look it up to see what it was!); not sure if it is even available, over here. I get all the crime, drama, and intrigue I want when I watch the evening news! :D

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wouldn't be surprised to see a USA channel pick up The Traitors. It has been very popular in Britain

      Delete
  11. Poor editing drives me crazy. Only yesterday, I was reading a book where a female character was starting to eat a chicken sandwich for lunch (a truly minor thing), but when I turned the page she was finishing up a tuna sandwich. A silly detail, but it was so distracting.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are right, trivial inconsistencies do distract

      Delete
  12. I haven't watched The Traitors either, so I'm in good company. Xx

    ReplyDelete

Always glad to hear from you - thanks for stopping by!
I am blocking anonymous comments now, due to excessive spam!